pa2a.org


Share Thread:  
Bill ‘Urging’ Hillary to Release Libya Docs That Would ‘Exonerate’ Her, Destroy OMao
#1
As much as I despise her, if she would fall on her sword for this POtuS and against America's interest, she's an even bigger POS than even I think.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ed-klein...ion-hopes/

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ordered additional security for the U.S. mission in Benghazi ahead of the terrorist attack but the orders were never carried out, according to “legal counsel” to Clinton who spoke to best-selling author Ed Klein. Those same sources also say former President Bill Clinton has been “urging” his wife to release official State Department documents that prove she called for additional security at the compound in Libya, which would almost certainly result in President Obama losing the election.

Appearing on TheBlazeTV’s “Wilkow!” on Wednesday night, Klein told host Andrew Wilkow that Bill and Hillary Clinton have been having “big fights” for “two or three weeks” about the issue, according to his two sources on Clinton’s legal counsel. While Bill Clinton wishes his wife would “exonerate” herself by releasing the documents that show she wasn’t at fault for the tragic security failure in Libya, the secretary of state refuses to do so because she doesn’t want to be viewed as a traitor to the Democratic party.

On Glenn Beck’s radio show earlier on Wednesday, Klein said his information comes from two “very good” sources.

Wilkow pointed out the obvious, that the Obamas and the Clintons have a “very behind the scenes, tense relationship” — to put it lightly.

“I said to you last night, and I think I stand corrected, that it seemed like Obama out-Clintoned the Clintons,” Wilkow said. “But Clinton seems to have gone along with all of this because he knew that Hillary would be exonerated in the end.”
"In 4 more OMao years you won't like how America looks....I guarantee it."
“When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty.” -- Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#2
Pocketprotector;29816 Wrote:As much as I despise her, if she would fall on her sword for this POtuS and against America's interest, she's an even bigger POS than even I think.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ed-klein...ion-hopes/

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ordered additional security for the U.S. mission in Benghazi ahead of the terrorist attack but the orders were never carried out, according to “legal counsel” to Clinton who spoke to best-selling author Ed Klein. Those same sources also say former President Bill Clinton has been “urging” his wife to release official State Department documents that prove she called for additional security at the compound in Libya, which would almost certainly result in President Obama losing the election.

Appearing on TheBlazeTV’s “Wilkow!” on Wednesday night, Klein told host Andrew Wilkow that Bill and Hillary Clinton have been having “big fights” for “two or three weeks” about the issue, according to his two sources on Clinton’s legal counsel. While Bill Clinton wishes his wife would “exonerate” herself by releasing the documents that show she wasn’t at fault for the tragic security failure in Libya, the secretary of state refuses to do so because she doesn’t want to be viewed as a traitor to the Democratic party.

On Glenn Beck’s radio show earlier on Wednesday, Klein said his information comes from two “very good” sources.

Wilkow pointed out the obvious, that the Obamas and the Clintons have a “very behind the scenes, tense relationship” — to put it lightly.

“I said to you last night, and I think I stand corrected, that it seemed like Obama out-Clintoned the Clintons,” Wilkow said. “But Clinton seems to have gone along with all of this because he knew that Hillary would be exonerated in the end.”

What's the credibility of this Ed Klein fellow?
Reply
#3
Johannes_Paulsen;29823 Wrote:
Pocketprotector;29816 Wrote:As much as I despise her, if she would fall on her sword for this POtuS and against America's interest, she's an even bigger POS than even I think.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ed-klein...ion-hopes/

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ordered additional security for the U.S. mission in Benghazi ahead of the terrorist attack but the orders were never carried out, according to “legal counsel” to Clinton who spoke to best-selling author Ed Klein. Those same sources also say former President Bill Clinton has been “urging” his wife to release official State Department documents that prove she called for additional security at the compound in Libya, which would almost certainly result in President Obama losing the election.

Appearing on TheBlazeTV’s “Wilkow!” on Wednesday night, Klein told host Andrew Wilkow that Bill and Hillary Clinton have been having “big fights” for “two or three weeks” about the issue, according to his two sources on Clinton’s legal counsel. While Bill Clinton wishes his wife would “exonerate” herself by releasing the documents that show she wasn’t at fault for the tragic security failure in Libya, the secretary of state refuses to do so because she doesn’t want to be viewed as a traitor to the Democratic party.

On Glenn Beck’s radio show earlier on Wednesday, Klein said his information comes from two “very good” sources.

Wilkow pointed out the obvious, that the Obamas and the Clintons have a “very behind the scenes, tense relationship” — to put it lightly.

“I said to you last night, and I think I stand corrected, that it seemed like Obama out-Clintoned the Clintons,” Wilkow said. “But Clinton seems to have gone along with all of this because he knew that Hillary would be exonerated in the end.”

What's the credibility of this Ed Klein fellow?


Well, he ain't a politician, so that helps, but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Klein seems like he has it out for the old girl. Doesn't mean he couldn't be right. Of all the believable scenarios Hillary volunteering to put her head in the noose without an escape plan sounds least likely.
tolerance for failure meter... LOW
Reply
#4
It's not about Klein. It's about Billary.
Klein told host Andrew Wilkow that Bill and Hillary Clinton have been having “big fights” for “two or three weeks” about the issue, according to his two sources on Clinton’s legal counse (Only Leftists make up sources)


"While Bill Clinton wishes his wife would “exonerate” herself by releasing the documents that show she wasn’t at fault for the tragic security failure in Libya, the secretary of state refuses to do so because she doesn’t want to be viewed as a traitor to the Democratic party."

Totally what I would expect. Statists are Statists first....above all else. They'll protect even the most despicable among themselves (as in the ONE) as long as it furthers party and state.
"In 4 more OMao years you won't like how America looks....I guarantee it."
“When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty.” -- Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#5
Ten*K;29827 Wrote:
Johannes_Paulsen;29823 Wrote:What's the credibility of this Ed Klein fellow?


Well, he ain't a politician, so that helps, but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Klein seems like he has it out for the old girl. Doesn't mean he couldn't be right. Of all the believable scenarios Hillary volunteering to put her head in the noose without an escape plan sounds least likely.

Agreed. I wonder if she is planning on exonerating herself only if she must go before an oversight committee/is facing potentially criminal charges/etc. and every other effort to get out of the situation failed. (F&F, anyone?)
Reply
#6
Ten*K;29827 Wrote:
Johannes_Paulsen;29823 Wrote:What's the credibility of this Ed Klein fellow?


Well, he ain't a politician, so that helps, but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Klein seems like he has it out for the old girl. Doesn't mean he couldn't be right. Of all the believable scenarios Hillary volunteering to put her head in the noose without an escape plan sounds least likely.

Just because I like the sound of what he says, doesn't mean I'm buying what he's selling. Sounds like bullshit to me. Sweet-smelling, but bullshit nonetheless.
Reply
#7
Ah yes, I'm sure that Bill is encouraging the release of documents that could cause his endorsed candidate to lose the race for the Presidency ... because he's that much of a flip-flopper and doesn't really care about the race at all.

Sorry, but Clinton's no Romney and as such I don't expect him to change his mind on something like that within a couple months time for some political expediency (especially since there is no political expediency in releasing such documents now rather than after the election, if they exist).

Clinton endorsed Obama, but is now all of a sudden seeking to reveal documents that would harm his election? Uh-huh. If he wants it known that something happened he just has to say it. Most TV shows or radio hosts in the country are open to him if he wants a message sent out.

If Clinton wants something told, I expect to hear it from him. Until I do it's all just pointless election-time rumors that hold zero credibility.

No-name sources, vague details, but of course whatever they are must be damaging to the President, all from a biased source. Yep, I'll believe that right now, sure. Dodgy
IronSight, proud to be a member of pa2a.org since Sep 2012.
Reply






Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Hillary Lost! kevindsingleton 16 1,587 12-30-2016, 12:30 PM
Last Post: Dangerzone2
  Hillary R. Clinton - 45th Presumptive-President of The United States ArcticSplash 17 2,254 07-07-2016, 09:00 PM
Last Post: goofin
  The Bill of Rights, FBI vs. APPLE – Part 1 sgtsandman 0 400 02-25-2016, 11:02 PM
Last Post: sgtsandman
  Hillary Mounts Her High Horse – Takes Shot at “White Privilege” das 6 2,841 07-03-2015, 04:01 AM
Last Post: DeadEye
  Congress first asked Hillary Clinton about personal email use in 2012, letter shows das 0 517 04-15-2015, 05:09 AM
Last Post: das



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Software by MyBB, © 2002-2015 MyBB Group.
Template by Modogodo Design.