pa2a.org


Share Thread:  
Chicago Murder Rate Blamed On . . . Wait For It . . . Global Warming!…
#1
Quote:Former CEO of Playboy magazine Christie Hefner appeared on MSNBC this morning to discuss gun control.

When discussing gun violence in Chicago, Hefner went into a diatribe, explaining how climate change has increased temperatures, therefore leading to heightened levels of violence.

Hefner works closely with the Center for American Progress.

http://freebeacon.com/former-ceo-of-play...te-change/
It's the "BILL OF RIGHTS" not the bill of "needs"
Reply
#2
middlefinger;73555 Wrote:
Quote:Former CEO of Playboy magazine Christie Hefner appeared on MSNBC this morning to discuss gun control.

When discussing gun violence in Chicago, Hefner went into a diatribe, explaining how climate change has increased temperatures, therefore leading to heightened levels of violence.

Hefner works closely with the Center for American Progress.

http://freebeacon.com/former-ceo-of-play...te-change/

Syphilis does in fact effect the brain.
"In 4 more OMao years you won't like how America looks....I guarantee it."
“When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty.” -- Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#3
Global warming? I thought all of that shit was bullshit? What about the emails that were found? Why are they still claiming global warmingShrug
Shrug Ive got my eyes on you
Reply
#4
Quote:The draft of a U.N. climate change report due to be published in 2014 has been leaked, and it shows that the four temperature models the U.N. used from 1990 to 2012 vastly overestimated the warming of the earth during that time.

The report from the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) had a graph that showed how four temperature models predicted the earth’s temperature was rising, but the midpoints of the rise the models predicted varied between 0.5 and 0.9 degrees, while the actual midpoints in the 1990-2012 era was only 0.28 degrees Fahrenheit.

Roy Spencer, a climatologist at the University of Alabama at Huntsville, commented on the evidence:

Temperatures have not risen nearly as much as almost all of the climate models predicted. Their predictions have largely failed, four times in a row... what that means is that it's time for them to re-evaluate.

It is evidence that CO2 is not nearly as strong a climate driver as the IPCC has been assuming.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/...he-Problem
It's the "BILL OF RIGHTS" not the bill of "needs"
Reply
#5
See? Its all bullshit. But as long as the tv says it true, it must be... Friggin sheep [Image: 119.gif]
Shrug Ive got my eyes on you
Reply
#6
Just so you know, not every scientist claiming global warming is a douche bag. Actually most aren't. I did some checking again recently and it seems that the models that predicted 4 to 6 feet of ocean level rise were stated to be only <40% accurate to hold out observations and that the press was aware of it at the time of release. The one that predicted ~4 inches was about 90% accurate and of course that one the press was given as well but of course didn't report on because who gives a shit if ocean levels rise 4 inches in 20 years.. This seems to be the case with temperature as well. The press takes the most inaccurate but dramatic one, reports on it and they don't even put a caveot that the most accurate show minimal impact.. I don't understand why they do this other than it makes a better emotional story. It most certaintly doesn't help their cause. It makes them look silly. FOr those that are wondering what I'm talking about in the late 80's 90's and early this century they predicted Manhattan would be under 4 feet of water by 2010, now they claim 2040 I believe. Yeah, um the real models scientists are using don't say that at all. They say by 2040 another 4 to 7 inches. but hey.. I don't have the links and I've been scratching to find them ever since I read them.. If someones google foo is working better than mine maybe they can find these articles.
Reply
#7
ExcelToExcel;73669 Wrote:Just so you know, not every scientist claiming global warming is a douche bag. Actually most aren't. I did some checking again recently and it seems that the models that predicted 4 to 6 feet of ocean level rise were stated to be only <40% accurate to hold out observations and that the press was aware of it at the time of release. The one that predicted ~4 inches was about 90% accurate and of course that one the press was given as well but of course didn't report on because who gives a shit if ocean levels rise 4 inches in 20 years.. This seems to be the case with temperature as well. The press takes the most inaccurate but dramatic one, reports on it and they don't even put a caveot that the most accurate show minimal impact.. I don't understand why they do this other than it makes a better emotional story. It most certaintly doesn't help their cause. It makes them look silly. FOr those that are wondering what I'm talking about in the late 80's 90's and early this century they predicted Manhattan would be under 4 feet of water by 2010, now they claim 2040 I believe. Yeah, um the real models scientists are using don't say that at all. They say by 2040 another 4 to 7 inches. but hey.. I don't have the links and I've been scratching to find them ever since I read them.. If someones google foo is working better than mine maybe they can find these articles.

Actually I read something last week that said the newer, more accurate, models were supposedly showing us headed into another cycle of global cooling. Wait 10 minutes, someone will change the direction of the conversation.
[Image: member955.png]
USAF (1976 -1986) NRA, GOA Anim_sniper2
"The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living." Dan Cofall
Reply
#8
[Image: Time-Climate-Covers.jpg]
It's the "BILL OF RIGHTS" not the bill of "needs"
Reply
#9
So what does the purveyor of pornography have to do with anything related to guns? Oh, absolutely nothing. Just another liberal elitist who thinks she knows exactly what everyone needs. Sugar, more nip and less lip, mmmkay? Thanks.
tolerance for failure meter... LOW
Reply
#10
billamj;73672 Wrote:
ExcelToExcel;73669 Wrote:Just so you know, not every scientist claiming global warming is a douche bag. Actually most aren't. I did some checking again recently and it seems that the models that predicted 4 to 6 feet of ocean level rise were stated to be only <40% accurate to hold out observations and that the press was aware of it at the time of release. The one that predicted ~4 inches was about 90% accurate and of course that one the press was given as well but of course didn't report on because who gives a shit if ocean levels rise 4 inches in 20 years.. This seems to be the case with temperature as well. The press takes the most inaccurate but dramatic one, reports on it and they don't even put a caveot that the most accurate show minimal impact.. I don't understand why they do this other than it makes a better emotional story. It most certaintly doesn't help their cause. It makes them look silly. FOr those that are wondering what I'm talking about in the late 80's 90's and early this century they predicted Manhattan would be under 4 feet of water by 2010, now they claim 2040 I believe. Yeah, um the real models scientists are using don't say that at all. They say by 2040 another 4 to 7 inches. but hey.. I don't have the links and I've been scratching to find them ever since I read them.. If someones google foo is working better than mine maybe they can find these articles.

Actually I read something last week that said the newer, more accurate, models were supposedly showing us headed into another cycle of global cooling. Wait 10 minutes, someone will change the direction of the conversation.

I read the same. Actually I think there were 5 predictions of cooling out of several dozen that disagreed. In one paper (not mentioned in the article of course) the prediction rate was some where near 70%. When tested vs. other models it lost considerably. However when weighted and combined with other reports, considered within the real scientific community, the rolling predictive average didn't change much at all. Expect a something like a .02 degree C change in ten years.. Real temperature will go from and average of 57.9 to 58.3 in ten years a change of about .4 degrees F.. In thirty years near 60.1

My god we're all going to die... 2 degrees more at the upper level in thirty years! Lower level was 58.4 a huge .5 degree bump. Biased corrected (sort of I guess cause I don't know how they did it) was 59.1 or a huge 1.1 degree F change and really what is probable. Imagine everyday being an average 1.1 degree hotter in 30 years? Death will result. Birds will fall out of the sky and dead frogs will litter our shores..

There are too many variables and assumptions. One assumption was something like 5000 new coal fired plants in 30 years world wide without any sequestration of CO2 produced and at the same rates.. I don't know what the prediction was for the US. Damnit I saved those pages somewhere..

Really? These guys need to be a little more honest and realistic. Though at least what I read was not nonsense, it was somewhat over my head and filled with assumptions that I can't seem to buy in today's political environment.

* everywhere I said 30 year really meant 2040 or 27 years.

Oh and these guys took into account sun activity and city development. IMO real factors. They didn't give the part-worths for CO2 and I'll probably never see them because those factors are probably so small, also they would mean nothing if the entire model coefficients aren't distributed with them and/or intercept if applicable. I remember in one paper they considered the methane chain reaction with rising temperatures and said that it was not going to be significant.
Reply






Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Mass murder attempt in Las Vegas RugerGirl 13 1,869 12-22-2015, 08:07 AM
Last Post: DeadEye
  Chicago Man suing burbs for guns RugerGirl 3 798 08-05-2015, 03:38 PM
Last Post: Uinta Firearms
  Another Bloody Chicago Weekend: 82 Shot, 14 Killed middlefinger 12 1,366 07-08-2014, 11:42 AM
Last Post: RugerGirl
  Self defense murder charge RugerGirl 2 580 06-06-2014, 10:28 PM
Last Post: RugerGirl
  16 Year Old Charged In Scranton Cab Driver’s Murder middlefinger 14 3,327 05-26-2014, 12:48 PM
Last Post: Normanvin



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Software by MyBB, © 2002-2015 MyBB Group.
Template by Modogodo Design.