pa2a.org


Share Thread:  
Court decision paves the way for Australian-style gun ban
#1
CAME ACROSS THIS ON A DIFFERENT SITE.
Quote:October 20, 2015
Court decision paves the way for Australian-style gun ban
By Michael Filozof
On Monday, the Court of Appeals for the Second U.S. Circuit issued a long awaited decision on the constitutionality of the most drastic gun control law in U.S. history, the New York SAFE Act of 2013. The Second Circuit ruled that nearly all of the law does not violate the Second Amendment.

The SAFE ("Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement") Act was presented to the New York State Senate and passed into law in 15 minutes. No debate was allowed, and senators did not have time to read the bill before voting it into law.



The SAFE Act is a complete ban on the sale or transfer of all military-style semi-automatic rifles manufactured within the past several decades. It is a total ban on the AR-15, AK-47, M-14/M-1a, HK G3, Steyr AUG, and many other civilian copies of military firearms. Prior to the passage of the law, Gov. Cuomo publicly stated that he was considering "confiscation" of existing rifles, but the final version of the law allowed existing owners to keep their rifles as long as they registered them with the State. Upon the death of the owner, the rifle will be confiscated; it cannot be transferred to an heir within New York State.

The SAFE Act also enacted a complete ban on the possession of all firearm magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds. The law contains no "grandfather" provision for previously legal items.

Beyond that, the SAFE Act banned all private transfers of firearms, except among spouses, parents, and children; it created an ammunition purchase background check and ammunition purchase registry; it banned the private sale of ammunition except from a licensed dealer; and it created a secret reporting requirement under which "mental health professionals" must report anyone suspected of being a "danger" to the State Police for mandatory gun confiscation.

Now that the Second Circuit has upheld the law, residents within the court's jurisdiction have no recourse except to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court – where there will be a guaranteed four votes against the Second Amendment. As I wrote last year, Gov. Cuomo and former Mayor Bloomberg, the backers of the SAFE Act, were betting that the law will be upheld by the Supreme Court, thus paving the way for a national version of the law (which has already been introduced in the Senate by Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.). Indeed, Cuomo immediately called for a national SAFE Act as soon as the Second Circuit issued its ruling Monday.

The Second Circuit's decision comes only one week after both President Obama and Hillary Clinton publicly praised the Australian and British mass gun confiscations of the 1990s.

If the SAFE Act is upheld by the Supreme Court, nothing prevents Congress from summarily outlawing tens of millions of firearms overnight. Once those firearms become contraband, the government may confiscate and destroy them without compensating the owner (just as the government confiscates and destroys illegal drugs).

The Second Circuit's decision leaves the Second Amendment in its gravest peril ever. Second Amendment rights are now hanging by a one-vote margin in the same Supreme Court that upheld Obamacare and declared a national right to gay marriage. Constitutional conservatives and Second Amendment supporters ought to be terrified over the prospect of Justice Scalia having a heart attack during a Hillary Clinton presidency.

The Second Circuit's decision places the hands of the Second Amendment doomsday clock at two minutes to midnight. If you think "it can't happen here," you're wrong.

It already is happening here.

On Monday, the Court of Appeals for the Second U.S. Circuit issued a long awaited decision on the constitutionality of the most drastic gun control law in U.S. history, the New York SAFE Act of 2013. The Second Circuit ruled that nearly all of the law does not violate the Second Amendment.



Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015...z3pFhH6peZ
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
das, proud to be a member of pa2a.org since Sep 2012.
Reply
#2
I get at least three doom newsletters like this a week in my mail, bundled with a donation card asking for $$$$ and my credit card number.

The constitutionality question will be over NYS's law it passed. If the worst thing happens and the court sustains it, then SAFE won't be repealed in that state. It doesn't autoimply that all 49 other states and U.S. Territories suddenly get their own version of a SAFE Act like New York passed.

It's already known there are 4 liberal justices on the court. There are 9 justices in total. 5 are needed for a majority. The author of this piece doesn't know what the fuck will happen, as do any of us.

I'll wait and reserve further comment until it actually gets to the Supreme Court.

If it actually gets there.
Reply
#3
ArcticSplash;169759 Wrote:I get at least three doom newsletters like this a week in my mail, bundled with a donation card asking for $$$$ and my credit card number.

The constitutionality question will be over NYS's law it passed. If the worst thing happens and the court sustains it, then SAFE won't be repealed in that state. It doesn't autoimply that all 49 other states and U.S. Territories suddenly get their own version of a SAFE Act like New York passed.

It's already known there are 4 liberal justices on the court. There are 9 justices in total. 5 are needed for a majority. The author of this piece doesn't know what the fuck will happen, as do any of us.

I'll wait and reserve further comment until it actually gets to the Supreme Court.

If it actually gets there.
First off I didnt see anything asking for money, and God knows we wouldnt want you to give anything to preserve YOUR rights. Second, Hilary has stated on the record that if she wins that is what she wants. The bozo in there now wants the same thing. This ruling isnt exactly great news in case you havnt noticed the anti's are growing bigger and more powerful. Keep on counting on that 1 judge margin you see how well it worked for Obama care. So yes please reserve your snide remarks until it plays out.
das, proud to be a member of pa2a.org since Sep 2012.
Reply
#4
ArcticSplash;169759 Wrote:I get at least three doom newsletters like this a week in my mail, bundled with a donation card asking for $$$$ and my credit card number.

The constitutionality question will be over NYS's law it passed. If the worst thing happens and the court sustains it, then SAFE won't be repealed in that state. It doesn't autoimply that all 49 other states and U.S. Territories suddenly get their own version of a SAFE Act like New York passed.

It's already known there are 4 liberal justices on the court. There are 9 justices in total. 5 are needed for a majority. The author of this piece doesn't know what the fuck will happen, as do any of us.

I'll wait and reserve further comment until it actually gets to the Supreme Court.

If it actually gets there.

Don't take this as harsh criticism. It's not.

If you win the election, will you enforce a SAFE act if it's passed in PA?
I don't suffer from insanity.
I enjoy every minute of it.
Reply
#5
All these laws are building to a major supreme court case in the near future. Right now it's probably a crap shoot if the justices will actually uphold the constitution. This is why the next election cycle has great importance. The next POTUS will get to appoint at least 2 justices in their tenure. If Hillary gets those appointments the constitution will go right out the window. I don't know how much better we will fair with a different POTUS, but I do know she will stack the court with the farthest left ones she can find. Everyone needs to support whomever is the rep nominee. This election could be the point of no return for the rights of people in this country.
RL Suehr, proud to be a member of pa2a.org since Aug 2013.
Reply
#6
Don't focus too much on this one. You should be watching Friedman v Highland Park. It's in front of SCOTUS right now.
Reply






Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  ‘Military-Style’ Firearms Aren’t Protected By Second Amendment, Court Rules sgtsandman 2 335 02-24-2017, 08:20 PM
Last Post: sgtsandman
  ban the use of traditional, lead-based ammunition on Federal lands Dannytheman 2 471 01-20-2017, 04:04 PM
Last Post: Dannytheman
  Dem Gun Ban Would Require Confiscation, Ban Most Pistols das 3 800 11-08-2015, 08:15 AM
Last Post: halftrack
  BANS ON BLACK RIFLES: WILL SUPREME COURT FINALLY DECIDE CONSTITUTIONALITY? das 4 922 11-03-2015, 08:41 PM
Last Post: das
  Assault Weapons Ban Before U.S. Supreme Court das 4 1,094 10-13-2015, 09:55 PM
Last Post: Uinta Firearms



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Software by MyBB, © 2002-2015 MyBB Group.
Template by Modogodo Design.