pa2a.org


Share Thread:  
Gun liability insurance: Make it mandatory?
#1
Gun liability insurance: Make it mandatory?
By Marcie Geffner • Bankrate.com

Should owners of firearms be required to carry gun liability insurance to cover the potential risks their weapons pose?

Or do law-abiding gun owners instead need protection from insurers who may charge them more for home and auto coverage or even deny them coverage when they "keep and bear arms"?

The insurance industry has been reluctantly drawn into these two heated debates by events such as the 2012 shooting death of unarmed Florida teenager Trayvon Martin by a man who claimed it was self-defense, and recent rampages such as the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.

Shootings usually not an insurance matter

Read more: http://www.bankrate.com/finance/insuranc...z39YFQhpTe
das, proud to be a member of pa2a.org since Sep 2012.
Reply
#2
Right. What insurance company is gonna cover gun owners anyway? Sounds expensive and unnecessary.
Error 396: Signature cannot be found.
Reply
#3
RugerGirl;151068 Wrote:Right. What insurance company is gonna cover gun owners anyway? Sounds expensive and unnecessary.
That is exactly why they want it, to make it too much of a liability to carry.
das, proud to be a member of pa2a.org since Sep 2012.
Reply
#4
Require inner city males between the ages of 16-45 to carry criminal liability insurance!
NRA Life Member, NRA Certified Instructor:  HFS, Pistol, Rifle, PPIH,PPOH
Suarez Combat Arms Instructor School
Admit nothing.  Deny everything. Demand proof.
If we lie to the government, it's a crime. If the government lies to the people, it's called politics.
Paying for welfare is slavery.
Reply
#5
(08-05-2014, 04:34 PM)das Wrote:
RugerGirl;151068 Wrote:Right. What insurance company is gonna cover gun owners anyway? Sounds expensive and unnecessary.
That is exactly why they want it, to make it too much of a liability to carry.
Typical liberal tactic. Make it too expensive or too much of a hassle because THEY KNOW they can't win any other way.
The law? The law is a human institution...
Reply
#6
have any of you taken the time to check it out? hell no you would rather piss and moan about it. if its going to be a reality i suggest looking into it
"Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity"

goofin, proud to be a member of pa2a.org since Sep 2012.
Reply
#7
csmith;151075 Wrote:
(08-05-2014, 04:34 PM)das Wrote: That is exactly why they want it, to make it too much of a liability to carry.
Typical liberal tactic. Make it too expensive or too much of a hassle because THEY KNOW they can't win any other way.

And in doing so price their poor base out of their freedom. Sounds racist to me. Kind of like a poll tax.

Quote:the 2012 shooting death of unarmed Florida teenager Trayvon Martin by a man who claimed it was self-defense
And was then proven correct in court.
Reply






Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Democrats Introduce National Mandatory Firearms Insurance Bill bigdawgbeav 5 996 05-29-2015, 08:14 PM
Last Post: spblademaker
  Ron Paul: Say No To Mandatory Mental Health Screening For Gun Purchases das 0 509 06-03-2014, 03:50 AM
Last Post: das
  D.C. Considers Mandatory $250K Insurance Policy for Gun Buyers middlefinger 5 868 05-17-2013, 12:12 AM
Last Post: ArcticSplash
  Majority of Americans say guns make homes safer middlefinger 2 645 04-18-2013, 04:13 PM
Last Post: boondongle
  Democrats propose $10,000 fine for gun owners who don’t have insurance Pocketprotector 16 5,818 04-03-2013, 06:33 PM
Last Post: MARINE DIVISION TWO



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Software by MyBB, © 2002-2015 MyBB Group.
Template by Modogodo Design.