pa2a.org


Share Thread:  
Harry Reid Prepares to Annihilate Second Amendment
#1
Gun Owners of America
Harry Reid Prepares to
Annihilate Second Amendment
“Our Founders intended the Senate to be a body where legislation was slowed down and subject to improvement through extended debate and amendment. [Harry] Reid’s proposed ‘reforms’ would remove two of the most fundamental rights traditionally reserved to all Senators -- to freely debate and amend legislation. I shall not stand for that.” -- Senator Rand Paul (R-KY)

On Election Day last November, several Democrat Senators were campaigning for reelection in pro-gun states. And in order to get their constituents’ votes, they promised fealty to the Second Amendment.

Dominic, on November 6, Democrat Senators Joe Manchin (WV), Bob Casey (PA) and Jon Tester (MT) all won their respective elections. These seats, among others, were crucial to helping Harry Reid return to the top post in the Senate.

But only a month after the election returns were tallied, the Senate -- under Majority Leader Harry Reid’s control -- is now crusading to implement:

* Gun bans on semiautomatic firearms and magazines;

* An effective ban on gun shows;

* A ban on private gun sales, without going through a gun dealer; and,

* Changes in the Senate rules which would allow them to ban guns with a mere 50 Senate votes.

This last proposal is particularly insidious. Gun grabbers are not going to be able to get 60 votes to break a Senate filibuster of gun control. But, with the help of fake “pro-gun” Senate Democrats, they may be able to get 50.

So the question of whether Senate Democrats will need 50 votes or 60 votes will determine whether gun control -– and much of Obama’s agenda -– will be slammed through and passed into law.

This brings us to the “nuclear option.”

This is a trick which anti-gun Democrats intend to use the first day of the Senate session in order to obliterate the Senate rules and clear the way for 50-vote passage of gun control.

Your senator’s vote on the “nuclear option” may be the most important gun-related vote he casts during the 113th Congress. It may be the difference between whether Obama can secure Senate passage of gun bans, magazine bans, gun show bans, and bans on private gun sales.

Anti-gun Democrats will try to tell you that the Senate is just following its precedents.

But that’s a bald-faced lie. As Democrats made clear during the Bush administration when the Republicans were contemplating the “nuclear option,” the nuclear option has been threatened, but the trigger has never been pulled.

Anti-gun Democrats will try to tell you that the “nuclear option” can only be invoked on the first day.

That’s a lie. Senate Rule 5, Paragraph 2, provides that the Senate rules continue from one Congress to the next, unless changed by 67 votes (needed to break a filibuster of rules changes). If the Senate can use brute force to obliterate Rule 5 by 50 votes, it can use brute force to obliterate any rule at any time by 50 votes.

This is a major vote that will have huge ramifications for our republic. Our gun rights are just one of the many freedoms that are on the chopping block right now. And if Harry Reid can squelch his opposition by nuking the filibuster, it will be the first step towards completely obliterating our Constitution.

ACTION: Click here to contact your Senators and tell them that the vote on the "nuclear option" will be the most important gun control vote of the 113th Congress. Urge them to vote AGAINST changing the Senate rules. Tell them to vote AGAINST the "nuclear option."

You may also phone the United States Capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121. A switchboard operator will connect you directly with the Senate office you request. LINK TO WRITE REPS: http://capwiz.com/gunowners/issues/alert...d=62313366
das, proud to be a member of pa2a.org since Sep 2012.
Reply
#2
If only we'd known....Anim_doh
"In 4 more OMao years you won't like how America looks....I guarantee it."
“When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty.” -- Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#3
But, but, but....the NRA gave him an 'A' rating! How can this be?
Rolleyes
Unbanned since September 2012.
Reply
#4
jahwarrior72;61926 Wrote:But, but, but....the NRA gave him an 'A' rating! How can this be?
Rolleyes

It is hard to fathom the how NRA failed to see through this weasel of Weasels.
"In 4 more OMao years you won't like how America looks....I guarantee it."
“When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty.” -- Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#5
Pocketprotector;61927 Wrote:
jahwarrior72;61926 Wrote:But, but, but....the NRA gave him an 'A' rating! How can this be?
Rolleyes

It is hard to fathom the how NRA failed to see through this weasel of Weasels.

He's been a useful idiot in the past keeping ant gun bills from being voted on. We'd be in a lot worse shape now if he'd lost his top spot in the senate and someone like Schumer took over. But Reid seems to have outlived his usefulness.
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
Reply






Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Pa. Employee Parking Lot Protection Amendment Filed to Transportation Bill das 1 707 06-23-2014, 05:03 PM
Last Post: soberbyker
  2nd Amendment Rights Action Day - April 29th, 2014 rocketfoot 0 761 04-22-2014, 04:38 PM
Last Post: rocketfoot
  Obama Pushing “Most Anti-Second Amendment Nominee” das 2 647 03-05-2013, 04:25 AM
Last Post: D10
  GOA We also deserved a vote, Mr. Obama, but we didn’t get it from Harry Reid! das 0 511 02-13-2013, 10:02 PM
Last Post: das
  The American Legion position on the Second Amendment 5711-Marine 1 786 01-27-2013, 01:01 PM
Last Post: Markheck1



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Software by MyBB, © 2002-2015 MyBB Group.
Template by Modogodo Design.