pa2a.org


Share Thread:  
If the ATF Is Eliminated, Will It Be Good or Bad for Gun Owners?
#1
If the ATF Is Eliminated, Will It Be Good or Bad for Gun Owners?

ATF agentsIf there’s one thing that the government is highly skilled at, it’s creating excessive amounts of bureaucracy and extra layers of red tape for people to jump through.

And Republican Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner is sick of it.

He has recently brought new legislation before Congress that would eliminate the ATF in its entirety, including all 5,000 agents who work for the agency.

The extra duties would be taken up by the FBI as well as the DEA. As Sensenbrenner says:

Washington should be responsible stewards of the American taxpayers’ money. While all too often that is not the case, this is a good government bill to streamline agency activity at DOJ—increasing effectiveness while decreasing cost.

The ATF is a largely duplicative, scandal ridden agency that lacks a clear mission. It is plagued by backlogs, funding gaps, hiring challenges and a lack of leadership. For decades it has been branded by high profile failures.

There is also significant overlap with other agencies. At a time when we are approaching $18 trillion in debt, waste and redundancy within our federal agencies must be addressed. Without a doubt, we can fulfill the role of the ATF more efficiently. http://therighttobear.com/if-the-atf-is-...un-owners/
das, proud to be a member of pa2a.org since Sep 2012.
Reply
#2
Eliminating them alone won't change any laws. It just means some other agency steps in to play the underfunded card. Get the government out of personal property entirely.
The law? The law is a human institution...
Reply
#3
Pairing down the gigantic stinking onion of Federal bureaucracy can only be a good thing.

The states deserve the sole power to regulate firearms.
tolerance for failure meter... LOW
Reply
#4
Holding my breath for 1..2..3..there I'm done.Rolleyes
Welcome to ObamaNation part deuxUtg
Reply
#5
[Image: ofr3ds.jpg]
Vampire pig man since September 2012
Reply
#6
They may get ride of atf they will just transfer personnel to other department for a grand total of 0 personnel let go and knowing the government they would need to hire people to assist it he the transition from one department to another so government would increase in size
Rcpaul, proud to be a member of pa2a.org since Jan 2013.
Reply
#7
A rose by any other name…..

It’s actually a very stupid idea. Right now they are intentionally underfunded, with some positive as well negative results, but burying them within another agency will also bury their budgets within the bigger agency. Efficient government remains the enemy of freedom.
Dave, proudly annoying members of pa2a.org since Sep 2012.
Reply
#8
Unless those "extra duties" are eliminated altogether instead of passed to the FBI, not much will change
Lkttomasz, proud to be a member of pa2a.org since Apr 2013.
Reply
#9
Now, if someone would just introduce a bill to eliminate the entire federal gov't we'll be off to a good start.
Reply
#10
Not unless you also get rid of the illegal UFA, NFA, GCA etc...
[Image: picsay-1358258813.jpg]
Reply






Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proposed ATF Regulation on Bump Stocks up for Public Comment sgtsandman 0 209 03-29-2018, 06:32 PM
Last Post: sgtsandman
  Stop Pat Toomey’s Assault on Gun Owners - march on offices longcall911 18 5,769 09-16-2015, 06:29 PM
Last Post: longcall911
  Sig Sauer Challenges ATF Open Letter Regarding SB-15 Brace Use das 0 484 01-26-2015, 08:22 AM
Last Post: das
  NRA National Gun Owners Survey das 11 1,849 06-24-2014, 11:08 PM
Last Post: Philadelphia Patriot
  rumour: 5.45x39 7n6 steel core ATF ban according to james yeager panopticonisi 11 4,733 03-28-2014, 10:26 PM
Last Post: panopticonisi



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Software by MyBB, © 2002-2015 MyBB Group.
Template by Modogodo Design.