pa2a.org


Share Thread:  
Jindal: Obama disqualified himself to be commander-in-chief
#1
Quote:Louisiana Governor: ISIS threat reveals Obama's failure as commander in chief

By Gov. Bobby Jindal
Published February 23, 2015
FoxNews.com

Jindal: Obama disqualified himself to be commander-in-chief



President Obama has shown the country that he is incapable of being commander-in-chief of the United States of America. One of the defining military challenges of our time is the spread of radical Islamist terrorism, and President Obama has focused more on criticizing America and lecturing the American people than on devising a plan to hunt down and kill these extremists.

Every day, Islamic State is expanding its atrocities, killing more innocent people, all while the president and his administration are refusing to admit we are at war, giving us history lessons about the Crusades, refusing to call out radical Islam as the root problem, and contending that jobs programs are the key to defeating terrorism.

We demand a leader who is going to spend less time criticizing America and more time hunting terrorists down and killing them.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/02/2...-in-chief/
das, proud to be a member of pa2a.org since Sep 2012.
Reply
#2
The last sentence kills me, since Obama has killed more Muslims then all of his predecessors. Then again, since when does fox news care about the truth?

Then the opening line; "Obama disqualified himself to be commander-in-chief,"

Too bad that's not how it works.

ISIS isn't our problem.

Justin
[Image: pafoasig.png]
Reply
#3
JustinHEMI;162128 Wrote:The last sentence kills me, since Obama has killed more Muslims then all of his predecessors. Then again, since when does fox news care about the truth?

Then the opening line; "Obama disqualified himself to be commander-in-chief,"

Too bad that's not how it works.

ISIS isn't our problem.

Justin
I believe Bush's 1 and 2 killed more Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan than O has. ISIS has declared war on the U.S. that kind of does make them our problem doesnt it? Should we wait until they strike here? How many Americans do they have to kill until it becomes our problem?
das, proud to be a member of pa2a.org since Sep 2012.
Reply
#4
I wouldn't doubt O hasn't killed more people than anyone else because he seems to be more insterested in acting upon the endless stream of new fighters rather than the infrastructure that creates them. He seems to like using a hellfire to wipe out a single terrorist in the middle of a wedding party so that the act of taking out that one guy results in a massive net recruiting windfall for every other terrorist group. A lot of people have made a very good living fighting this so-called "War on Terror" we certainly can't let it end anytime soon or whatever else would we do with all these $770k helmets we are producing? We need an Emanuel Goldstein at all times except in this case we have created an actual enemy rather than a figment of propaganda only. This is why though we are actively empowering groups like ISIS through our continued do nothing impotent attacks in the area to cause real damage to justify our continued intervention in the Middle East. ISIS is our problem because we created it. I'm certain sooner or later it will manifest on our shores. I'm generally non-interventionist, but in the end you can't turn your back on the Frankenstein's monster that we have loosed upon the world.

My other concern is with all the shit that is happening in the world right now and so fast it's going to cause lots of people everywhere to believe we are seriously living in the end times and then all hell will really break loose even if its not true.
The forum poster formerly known as Emoticon...
Reply
#5
das;162134 Wrote:
JustinHEMI;162128 Wrote:The last sentence kills me, since Obama has killed more Muslims then all of his predecessors. Then again, since when does fox news care about the truth?

Then the opening line; "Obama disqualified himself to be commander-in-chief,"

Too bad that's not how it works.

ISIS isn't our problem.

Justin
I believe Bush's 1 and 2 killed more Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan than O has. ISIS has declared war on the U.S. that kind of does make them our problem doesnt it? Should we wait until they strike here? How many Americans do they have to kill until it becomes our problem?

Thanks for the coaching..., by Muslims I meant terrorists.

The fact is, Obama is a terrorist killer. Better than his predecessors.

ISIS can't strike here.

Justin
[Image: pafoasig.png]
Reply
#6
There is more evidence they are here or at least their sympathizers are than there is speaking to them not being here and unable to strike. Even if they don't strike directly their successes in the Middle East serve as inspiration to fellow traveler malcontents here. ISIS flags in front of the Whitehouse. A woman getting her head sawn off at a poultry plant for being the "wrong" religion...

"Can't" is a pretty strong word. A few guys in a mall with off the shelf weapons in a disarmed state would rock this country the same as 9/11...as they have threatened in the past 2 days. It's not something I live in fear of due to the astronomical odds of it actually happening to me, but the threat is undoubtedly real. Personally I think another major attack by Islamic extremists will bring down the president and his merry band of apologists like Josh Earnest, Eric Holder, Jen Psaki and Marie Harf. They're so separated from reality that it doesn't click with them that nobody except the most hardcore liberal buys into their BS anymore, once that sort of rhetoric and inaction gets Americans killed on American soil they will no longer be able to talk their way out of it anymore.
The forum poster formerly known as Emoticon...
Reply
#7
JustinHEMI;162293 Wrote:ISIS can't strike here.

They can, and at some point they will.

Whether we should hide under a rock or round muslim people in cattle cars or keep watching reality TV is a totally different discussion...

...but ISIS has the motivation, desire, and ability to perform terrorist activities on US soil and some day they will.

No...they will not fly over in their ISIS branded aircraft carriers and ISIS labelled fighter jets with "Ride of the Valkyrie's" playing in the background, but they will strike on US soil at some point.
Vampire pig man since September 2012
Reply
#8
No they can't, and they won't.

Unless you have proof that they can that you're not sharing?

Justin
[Image: pafoasig.png]
Reply
#9
JustinHEMI;162334 Wrote:No they can't, and they won't.

Unless you have proof that they can that you're not sharing?

Justin

You really believe that these "lone wolf" attacks as the White House calls them have nothing to do with the rise of ISIS? Perhaps they're not specifically ISIS members by definition as a simple matter of geography, but they are absolutely within the same vein, and they've certainly started growing balls since ISIS started lopping heads off. Either way at that point it's semantics. Even if one of them did an attack while wrapping themselves in the black ISIS flag, there isn't a chance this administration would even call it as it is. I would expect they would rather deem the attacker a disgruntled future citizen or something outrageous like that to not dare let the M,I or T words slip. Did Eric Holder hijack your account? I see echoes of the interview he gave the other day.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/24/us/new-yor...-attacked/

http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/26/world/minn...ilty-plea/

Meanwhile... In NJ...

[Image: HT_flag2_ml_140814_16x9_992.jpg]

And in Canada...

Quote:Certainly, the federal government seems content to have a certain view of gunman Michael Zehaf-Bibeau's motivations prevail: that he was a conventional jihadi terrorist inspired by, and perhaps in direct communication with, the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, also known as ISIS.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/was-mich...-1.2970066
The forum poster formerly known as Emoticon...
Reply
#10
Not proof that they can strike America in any meaningful way.

Not our problem.

No blood spilled for them. No American lives on the ground.

No more illegal wars.

Justin
[Image: pafoasig.png]
Reply






Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  White House defends Biden as ex-Pentagon chief Gates unloads Philadelphia Patriot 0 465 01-08-2014, 01:38 PM
Last Post: Philadelphia Patriot
  Energy Department chief hails Solyndra loan program as 'terrific success' das 1 594 10-01-2013, 04:25 PM
Last Post: nomad
  Al Nusra Front Commander Says Free Syrian Army Selling Them Weapons…. middlefinger 0 825 07-28-2013, 02:46 PM
Last Post: middlefinger
  Obama Activist and Poll Worker on Camera: “I Voted Twice for Obama” middlefinger 37 2,930 03-12-2013, 04:20 PM
Last Post: Xavier
  The purpose of the Obama tax increases is to reward Obama’s cronies middlefinger 2 857 01-05-2013, 06:02 PM
Last Post: middlefinger



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Software by MyBB, © 2002-2015 MyBB Group.
Template by Modogodo Design.