Share Thread:  
Kane shut down sting that snared Phila. officials
Quote:Could her words on sting haunt Kane?

As Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane has been speaking out against a sting investigation aimed at corrupt politicians, defense lawyers in other high-profile cases have been listening.

They hope to use her words against her.

In vigorously defending her decision to shut down the sting, Kane has taken aim at everything from the legal theory behind the case to the motives of the prosecutors who ran it.

In the process, the defense lawyers say, she has raised issues they could use to challenge two of the highest-profile cases her office is handling: one alleging corruption at the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission and another a cover-up of sex abuse at Pennsylvania State University.

Jeffrey M. Lindy, a Philadelphia defense lawyer who does not have a client in either case, said Kane had been making "monumental policy announcements" that have undermined her own side.

"Look, I'm on the defense side," Lindy said. "But the system doesn't work unless both sides are equally armed. Right now, I believe what she's doing is giving a lot of ammunition to the defense."

Since The Inquirer revealed the aborted sting on March 16, Kane has said she had no choice but to end the investigation without bringing criminal charges, even though sources say the operation captured five Philadelphia Democrats pocketing cash or gifts.

Kane said the inquiry never nailed down what she called "the critical criminal element" of a quid pro quo: money "directly in exchange for official action."

Critics of the investigation point out that the sting's undercover operative paid his targets to vote against a bill they already opposed.

In the turnpike case, defense lawyers have seized on the attorney general's statement, even coining a phrase for it: the "Kane doctrine."

If the "Kane doctrine" requires a prosecutor to document a clear quid pro quo in corruption cases, they say, their clients should have all charges dismissed because the state cannot show they steered specific contracts in return for gifts.

Kane says her analysis of the sting case has no bearing on the turnpike prosecution. In the turnpike case, prosecutors allege seven defendants - politicians, turnpike administrators, and businessmen - traded campaign contributions and gifts for contracts.

"This is apples and oranges," her spokesman, J.J. Abbott, said last week.

"An 85-page grand jury presentment detailed an elaborate scheme by the defendants to enrich themselves in exchange for turnpike business. These arguments by the defense are a desperate attempt to distract from the alleged crimes of their clients."

The stakes are high in the turnpike case and the pending trial in which Penn State's former president and two former administrators are charging with trying to cover up former coach Jerry Sandusky's wrongdoing. The cases involve prominent defendants, powerful institutions, and an attorney general whose record will be shaped by their outcomes.

David Shapiro, who represents former Turnpike Commission Chairman Mitchell Rubin, said Kane was right to call for an explicit quid pro quo in corruption cases. He said that was precisely what was lacking in the turnpike case.

"The issue is the quid pro quo evidence. We have no idea what it is," Shapiro said at a hearing last month crowded with defense lawyers. "Not anybody on this side of the room has any clue as to what the link is between the contributions and the contracts."

William Fetterhoff, another defense lawyer in the case, said last week the Kane doctrine might influence how the judge instructs the jury.

"It's a question of the jury being made aware of the fact that these two isolated acts - campaign contributions on the one hand and contracts on the other - don't establish bribery," Fetterhoff said.

The prosecutor in the turnpike case, Senior Deputy Attorney General Laurel Brandstetter, has argued that the Attorney General's Office need not draw such a tight connection.

Read more
[Image: pa_zps59e4c512.png?t=1379682235]
Benghazi, PA.
tolerance for failure meter... LOW

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Kane won't seek Re-Election bigdawgbeav 14 2,084 10-31-2016, 01:50 AM
Last Post: DeadEye
  Grand jury recommends criminal charges against Attorney General Kathleen Kane soberbyker 27 4,915 08-16-2016, 04:14 PM
Last Post: DeadEye
  Senate Vote on Kane Ouster bigdawgbeav 4 986 02-10-2016, 03:55 PM
Last Post: bigdawgbeav
  Two more plead guilty in Philly sting bigdawgbeav 11 2,874 06-08-2015, 09:49 PM
Last Post: Rik Bitter
  A.G. Kane mulls U.S. Senate run Philadelphia Patriot 17 2,949 12-16-2013, 04:55 PM
Last Post: Johannes_Paulsen

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Software by MyBB, © 2002-2015 MyBB Group.
Template by Modogodo Design.