pa2a.org


Share Thread:  
Magpul Joins Lawsuit To Invalidate Colorado Gun Laws
#1
Quote:FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

MAGPUL INDUSTRIES ANNOUNCES LAWSUIT TO INVALIDATE COLORADO GUN CONTROL MEASURES

Denver, Colorado - May 17th, 2013 - Magpul Industries, an Erie, Colorado, based manufacturer of firearms accessories, announced today that it has joined 53 Colorado County Sheriffs and other plaintiffs in filing a lawsuit this morning to invalidate gun control measures recently passed by the Colorado legislature and enacted by Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper.

The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court and establishes that Colorado House Bill 1224 (magazine restrictions) and House Bill 1229 (universal background checks) violate the constitutional rights of lawful gun owners located in Colorado.

Duane Liptak, Director of Product Management and Marketing for Magpul Industries, said that these gun control laws do nothing other than restrict the ability of law abiding citizens to defend themselves and Magpul is committed to invalidating these infringements:

"Colorado's recently passed gun control laws are a direct assault on the constitutional rights of the responsible people who live in and visit this great state. These laws will do nothing to enhance public safety and only place unreasonable limitations on the ability of law abiding citizens to defend themselves. While Magpul is currently in the process of moving its operations out of Colorado, we will not turn our back on our native state. Extreme gun control interests have forced the passage of these unconstitutional laws in Colorado, and as a company, we are resolved to restore those rights to the people."

Magpul's outside legal counsel, Jon Anderson, of Holland & Hart LLP, said that the Colorado gun control bills are unconstitutional and so poorly drafted that the new laws would be enforced in an inconsistent manner:

"Colorado's gun control laws are in direct conflict with the U.S. Constitution. In addition, these bills were so poorly drafted that no one agrees on the scope of the government regulation. If teams of lawyers cannot agree on what these bills prohibit, how can we expect citizens to abide by these laws and how can we rely on law enforcement to implement these laws in a consistent manner?"

Magpul will continue to support productive efforts to FREE COLORADO from government regulations that imperil the rights of law abiding firearm owners.

The have posted on their FB page that they still intend on moving out of the state BTW.
Reply
#2
dc dalton;102007 Wrote:The have posted on their FB page that they still intend on moving out of the state BTW.

I sent them a e-mail stating they should move to Erie, PANinja...even provided them with contact info for The Manufacturers Assoc., GEIDC, info on KOZ & varoius properties that would suit their needs. I also outlined the manufacturing history and the scope of the current plastics industry here (workers). Hey, it was worth a shot, and the play on the Erie name hopefully caught their attention.
Reply
#3
I will be watching this lawsuit carefully. This has the potential to be incredibly helpful for the 2A...


... or incredibly disastrous.
Reply






Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Gabby Giffords Visits Chris Christie to Push Firearm Confiscation Laws Pocketprotector 3 899 03-19-2015, 11:58 AM
Last Post: Ten*K
  If All Goes as Planned, This State Will No Longer Enforce Federal Gun Laws das 3 821 11-23-2014, 09:44 PM
Last Post: Lkttomasz
  Patrick signs bill to tighten Mass. gun laws das 0 578 08-14-2014, 09:59 AM
Last Post: das
  Can states exempt themselves from federal gun laws? bigdawgbeav 7 1,111 08-06-2014, 06:55 PM
Last Post: gascolator
  In 5-4 Decision SCOTUS Says Straw Purchaser Laws ArcticSplash 13 1,643 06-17-2014, 06:37 AM
Last Post: DeadEye



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Software by MyBB, © 2002-2015 MyBB Group.
Template by Modogodo Design.