pa2a.org


Share Thread:  
Maryland House bill would link gun, criminal registries
#1
The state officials there estimate they could disqualify up to 110,000 registered gun owners. The bill also allows for newly hired state troopers to go door to door to take these people's firearms.

How many times have I heard the gun control pols and activists make public statements assuring gun owners that a newly proposed bill for gun registration won't lead to confiscation. "We're not looking to take your guns. We're not taking away your rights," they would say. They are full of baloney.

Quote:http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/House...288796.php

By NICK TABOR, Associated Press
Updated 6:58 pm, Tuesday, March 4, 2014

ANNAPOLIS, Md. (AP) — The House of Delegates is considering a bill that would link Maryland's gun registry to its criminal database.

State law requires gun owners to surrender their weapons if they're convicted of felonies or any violent crimes, but Del. Luiz Simmons, D-Montgomery, said Maryland State Police lack a systematic way of enforcing this. They can't use their databases to identify gun owners convicted of crimes.

Simmons is chief sponsor of legislation to make that link.

State Police estimate that if they linked the databases, they would find 10 percent of registered gun owners — about 110,000 people — would be disqualified. They estimate a rate of 1 percent each year thereafter.

Under Simmons' plan, police would run a systematic check at least twice a year.
Live Free or Die
Reply
#2
I don't like the whole "this person's a gun owner, they might just be a criminal" link. It's offensive.

If you replaced "gun owner" with any other walk of life, this would be shot down faster than an Iraqi jet in the first Gulf War.

Ridiculous.

That said, if a person is prohibited, they are prohibited.

On a larger topic, I think far too many people are on the prohibited list. I don't care if you got stopped with a small amount of weed, I don't care if you cheated your taxes or did some other non-violent crime. If violence was not part of it, you should not lose gun rights.

Further, if a person is that much of a threat to the public that they cannot be allowed to defend themselves, then perhaps they should never see the light of day again. If the "bad guys" were all in the slammer, it would make things a whole lot simpler. Even if there were a gun stashed somewhere, they would have no way of accessing it.
bluetrane2028, proud to be a member of pa2a.org since Feb 2013.
Reply






Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Excellent link, guns vs cars RugerGirl 4 625 12-06-2015, 02:06 PM
Last Post: RugerGirl
  NC National Guard carry bill passes. Rosco the Iroc 1 673 08-24-2015, 10:02 PM
Last Post: sgtsandman
  Democrats Introduce National Mandatory Firearms Insurance Bill bigdawgbeav 5 888 05-29-2015, 08:14 PM
Last Post: spblademaker
  Dem bill targets online ammo sales das 7 1,499 05-16-2015, 01:10 AM
Last Post: ArcticSplash
  Democrat Introduces Massive Gun Grab Bill In Illinois Senate das 6 1,221 05-08-2015, 05:13 PM
Last Post: Uinta Firearms



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Software by MyBB, © 2002-2015 MyBB Group.
Template by Modogodo Design.