pa2a.org


Share Thread:  
Massive gun control effort underway
#11
I don't believe the scanner one bit. you aren't detecting adrenaline levels from a laser. WE can't effectively detect sugar levels yet with a laser. THe second that happens I know a lot of diabetics that would be thrilled.

Also I don't believe any UN resolution will be able to be passed that overrules the 2nd for more than 3.2 seconds before Montana Militia load up the trucks and head to washington.
Reply
#12
cgk;41292 Wrote:This is so very wrong it's hard to reply. There is NO way a treaty, even if signed by the executive branch and approved by the Senate, can overturn the second amendment. It just doesn't work that way.

It's just easier to indulge in middlefinger's logic rather than debunk every Conspiracy Of The Day post. Less work.
Reply
#13
ArcticSplash;41324 Wrote:
cgk;41292 Wrote:This is so very wrong it's hard to reply. There is NO way a treaty, even if signed by the executive branch and approved by the Senate, can overturn the second amendment. It just doesn't work that way.

It's just easier to indulge in middlefinger's logic rather than debunk every Conspiracy Of The Day post. Less work.

Article 6 of the United States Constitution:
Quote: Article VI

All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

You were saying?
[Image: member955.png]
USAF (1976 -1986) NRA, GOA Anim_sniper2
"The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living." Dan Cofall
Reply
#14
billamj;41354 Wrote:
ArcticSplash;41324 Wrote:It's just easier to indulge in middlefinger's logic rather than debunk every Conspiracy Of The Day post. Less work.

Article 6 of the United States Constitution:
Quote: Article VI

All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

You were saying?
Enclosing your head in a Faraday cage is the only answer to Gov't brainwave voodoo
Reply
#15
SCOTUS has already ruled that treaties do not trump our rights. See Reid vs Covert.
Enclosing your head in a Faraday cage is the only answer to Gov't brainwave voodoo
Reply
#16
Scanners aside, kinda makes ya wonder why this Administration is hell bent on signing the UN treaty though, doesn't it?

Do you honestly believe this Administration gives a damn about laws or treaties? After Benghazi, Fast & Furious, illegal voters, foreign donations.......They have yet to convince me that the law means anything to them.
[Image: incubi+INK.jpg]. ABC,CBS,NBC,CNN no diff
Reply
#17
Am I correct in believing that treaties require 60 votes in the Senate?

If so, it has no chance of passing.
A gun rack in a pick-up is not for holding guns. Its a place for women to hold on to. Smile
Reply
#18
MrPeanut;41499 Wrote:Am I correct in believing that treaties require 60 votes in the Senate?

If so, it has no chance of passing.

Only if it is brought up for a vote.
[Image: incubi+INK.jpg]. ABC,CBS,NBC,CNN no diff
Reply
#19
Spacemanvic;41471 Wrote:Scanners aside, kinda makes ya wonder why this Administration is hell bent on signing the UN treaty though, doesn't it?

To create the illusion of doing something?
Welcome to ObamaNation part deuxUtg
Reply
#20
God's Country;41509 Wrote:
Spacemanvic;41471 Wrote:Scanners aside, kinda makes ya wonder why this Administration is hell bent on signing the UN treaty though, doesn't it?

To create the illusion of doing something?

Got a feeling it's gonna be more than that....
[Image: incubi+INK.jpg]. ABC,CBS,NBC,CNN no diff
Reply






Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  14 Hour Gun Control Filibuster halftrack 3 1,047 06-16-2016, 12:25 PM
Last Post: Mr_Gixxer
  Democrat Introduces Massive Gun Grab Bill In Illinois Senate das 6 1,586 05-08-2015, 05:13 PM
Last Post: Uinta Firearms
  U.S. District Court finds provision of 1968 Gun Control Act unconstitutional das 0 846 02-19-2015, 04:51 AM
Last Post: das
  Let’s not be so quick to believe gun-control rhetoric das 0 783 02-17-2015, 10:43 AM
Last Post: das
  Nevada gun control law headed to voting ballots in 2016 panopticonisi 5 1,279 12-12-2014, 02:13 PM
Last Post: Ten*K



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Software by MyBB, © 2002-2015 MyBB Group.
Template by Modogodo Design.