pa2a.org


Share Thread:  
Michelle was caught cheating on her expense report.
#1
...as she rolls up millions in expenses

Obama Daughters are Michelle's 'Senior Staffers'

This information was obtained by Judicial Watch March, 2012. The Obama administration had to be sued to get this through the FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT. Michelle Obama listed daughters as 'Senior Staffers' to justify her expensive African vacation and safari.

Judicial Watch said the U.S. Air Force provided a C-32 ( a Boeing 757 ), modified by the military for the purpose of flying big-wigs around the world, to fly the First Lady and her entourage to and from Africa , at a cost of $424,142. Another $928.44 was listed as 'bulk food' costs per meal for the192 on board meals for the 21 people who made the trip.

The Obama daughters were listed on the manifest as “Senior Staff.” 'This trip was as much an opportunity for the Obama family to go on a safari as it was a trip to conduct government business,' said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. 'This junket wasted tax dollars and the resources of our over extended military. No wonder we had to sue to pry loose this information.' The nation is suffering with the economy sputtering, the national debt soaring and Obama's economic rescue policies not only failing, but actively making things worse. (Who authorized Michelle Obama to conduct Foreign Affairs Business for the United State?)

Meanwhile, the First Lady justifies an expensive trip to Africa to take a vacation and safari with her daughters by saying it's 'official business' going so far as to list her children as staffers. The arrogance and dishonesty are shocking.

To get the truth out, you must pass along the info. The major media outlets do NOT DARE say anything negative about the Obamas.


True story. Check the link:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/...to-africa/
I swear, by my life and my love of it, that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine. - Ayn Rand
Reply
#2
Unless Michelle raped and consumed her daughters, the left & media will not care.

And even then...
Vampire pig man since September 2012
Reply
#3
Not surprising. They have taken advantage and abused every perk the President gets. Why does his in laws have to go places with him? More equipment more security all paid in full by us.
das, proud to be a member of pa2a.org since Sep 2012.
Reply
#4
das;21964 Wrote:Not surprising. They have taken advantage and abused every perk the President gets. Why does his in laws have to go places with him? More equipment more security all paid in full by us.

I'll be honest...I don't have a huge issue with them taking a vacation and using US resources. It's part of what I believe EVERY President and immediate family should be provided as a benefit to the position. What I DO have a problem with is the total disregard for price and perception. They have taken advantage.
Shadowline, proud to be a member of pa2a.org since Sep 2012.
Reply
#5
Shadowline;21988 Wrote:
das;21964 Wrote:Not surprising. They have taken advantage and abused every perk the President gets. Why does his in laws have to go places with him? More equipment more security all paid in full by us.

I'll be honest...I don't have a huge issue with them taking a vacation and using US resources. It's part of what I believe EVERY President and immediate family should be provided as a benefit to the position. What I DO have a problem with is the total disregard for price and perception. They have taken advantage.

If it was just a vacation, then why the need for her to list the daughters as senior advisers? Is there something else going on for her to have felt the need to do that?
Reply
#6
Shadowline;21988 Wrote:
das;21964 Wrote:Not surprising. They have taken advantage and abused every perk the President gets. Why does his in laws have to go places with him? More equipment more security all paid in full by us.

I'll be honest...I don't have a huge issue with them taking a vacation and using US resources. It's part of what I believe EVERY President and immediate family should be provided as a benefit to the position. What I DO have a problem with is the total disregard for price and perception. They have taken advantage.

Bold highlighted for effect. A vacation. As in singular. As in one, per year.

Michelle has taken 16, prior to Feb 2012. And the cost to send her on a 3 day weekend is more than what you and I make in a year, I'm willing to bet.
Vampire pig man since September 2012
Reply
#7
Let me just try to clarify my earlier response. I DON'T have trouble with vacations (yes plural), as long as there is consideration for cost and perception of the spending. If they want to go skiing in Feb and to Hawaii to visit family in Aug I'm totally fine with that. I am NOT fine with the total cost of these trips which is a product of number of trips and cost of each trip.

If they are going to be allowed to take a vacation on our dime their needs to be regulation around it. Too often these guys have proven they can't manage to be responsible. Bush practically lived outside of DC, and Obama's kids must have a fully stamped passport by now.
Shadowline, proud to be a member of pa2a.org since Sep 2012.
Reply
#8
Shadowline;22005 Wrote:Let me just try to clarify my earlier response. I DON'T have trouble with vacations (yes plural), as long as there is consideration for cost and perception of the spending. If they want to go skiing in Feb and to Hawaii to visit family in Aug I'm totally fine with that. I am NOT fine with the total cost of these trips which is a product of number of trips and cost of each trip.

If they are going to be allowed to take a vacation on our dime their needs to be regulation around it. Too often these guys have proven they can't manage to be responsible. Bush practically lived outside of DC, and Obama's kids must have a fully stamped passport by now.

Bush spent most of his time at his ranch, not running around the world. I can't fault Bush for doing that. It's cheaper to provide security in on set spot than it is to provide it in foreign countries.
Reply
#9
streaker69;22008 Wrote:
Shadowline;22005 Wrote:Let me just try to clarify my earlier response. I DON'T have trouble with vacations (yes plural), as long as there is consideration for cost and perception of the spending. If they want to go skiing in Feb and to Hawaii to visit family in Aug I'm totally fine with that. I am NOT fine with the total cost of these trips which is a product of number of trips and cost of each trip.

If they are going to be allowed to take a vacation on our dime their needs to be regulation around it. Too often these guys have proven they can't manage to be responsible. Bush practically lived outside of DC, and Obama's kids must have a fully stamped passport by now.

Bush spent most of his time at his ranch, not running around the world. I can't fault Bush for doing that. It's cheaper to provide security in on set spot than it is to provide it in foreign countries.

Have to agree with streaker on this one. The whole Bush family traveled to a single location that they owned and was well known by the Secret Service. The Obama's fly separately, often to different locations, that neither of them own, and the girls may or may not fly with their parents. The cost of flying them around for various vacations is astounding since ALL four of them require security and they can't be covered by just one group of agents.
[Image: member955.png]
USAF (1976 -1986) NRA, GOA Anim_sniper2
"The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living." Dan Cofall
Reply
#10
billamj;22012 Wrote:
streaker69;22008 Wrote:Bush spent most of his time at his ranch, not running around the world. I can't fault Bush for doing that. It's cheaper to provide security in on set spot than it is to provide it in foreign countries.

Have to agree with streaker on this one. The whole Bush family traveled to a single location that they owned and was well known by the Secret Service. The Obama's fly separately, often to different locations, that neither of them own, and the girls may or may not fly with their parents. The cost of flying them around for various vacations is astounding since ALL four of them require security and they can't be covered by just one group of agents.

Don't forget that at one point the Obama's dog flew on a separate flight from the rest of the family. On a couple of occasions Michelle followed her husband by a couple of hours on another flight. They don't care about what is being spent.

Maybe the office of the president should have a fixed operating budget for such things for the term of the current president. Once that budget is spent, no more travels.
Reply






Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Michelle Obama’s Hammer-Subtle Racial Photo Op das 2 772 07-17-2014, 07:25 AM
Last Post: Camper
  Michelle Obama Welcomes New U.S. Citizens By Promoting Immigration Agenda das 1 653 06-26-2014, 12:41 AM
Last Post: Emoticon
  Guess Which Senators Want the Feds to Report Ammo Purchases? das 5 834 05-12-2014, 06:36 PM
Last Post: MrPeanut
  Dems float 2016 Dream Ticket: Hillary-Michelle... Pocketprotector 10 1,801 03-29-2014, 03:42 AM
Last Post: panopticonisi
  U.S. Government Caught Pirating Military Software, Settles For $50 Million 6speed 1 637 11-30-2013, 07:34 AM
Last Post: Camper



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Software by MyBB, © 2002-2015 MyBB Group.
Template by Modogodo Design.