Share Thread:  
Obama's form letter faux pas....
The Classless One - ever campaigning... Dodgy

Ignorance’: White House sends unrelated form letter after 9/11 survivor’s request to pull bin Laden ad

Published: 10:26 AM 09/25/2012

Quote:An open letter from a 9/11 survivor to President Obama requesting that the president cease invoking the death of Osama bin Laden as a re-election tool has been answered with a completely unrelated form response from the White House.

That response, provided to The Daily Caller, did not include a single reference to Army Major David King’s objections and instead reminded him that, “Each day, I hear from concerned men and women who are struggling in this economy.” What follows is an 1100-word insistence that Obama is attempting to turn the economy around. The letter ends by telling Maj. King, “For more information on jobs, health benefits, housing assistance, and other public resources, you may also call 1-800-FEDINFO or visit”

Nowhere in the White House letter is the bin Laden raid mentioned. A Google search of the text shows the same response letter is often sent to individuals who write critical letters to the White House.

“I was disappointed that I didn’t receive anything specifically addressing my concern,” King told TheDC in a phone interview. “All I got back was a re-election letter.”

King is a former Army Special Forces operator and wounded survivor of al Qaida’s September 11, 2001 attack on the Pentagon. One of his colleagues described King’s injuries that day.

“Maj. David King came walking out of the smoke from the direction of the fire,” recounted former Army Major Bill Delaney in a description published on in 2011.

“As he limped toward us with his shredded uniform and skin hanging from his burns, completely covered in a white ash, he looked like a ghost. Dave shared an office with Jerry Dickerson and Staff Sgt. White. Tragically both were killed in the [plane's] impact, but miraculously Dave had survived. Dave had burns on 70 percent of his body and would endure many months of recovery before he returned to duty,” said Delaney.

The White House did not return a request for comment on whether King’s unique credentials should have merited a personalized response instead of a form letter.

King said he was surprised the White House wouldn’t at least write back something to the effect of, “‘Let it be known that we understand from where you’re coming from, from your position and what you’ve gone through that you are making a legitimate complaint and we will address that.’ They didn’t even try.”

The Obama Administration may view responding to King’s letter as a political liability.

In 2012, King has publicly criticized the president alongside a group of former service members that make up the Special Operations OPSEC Education Fund. The group has received a flurry of media attention for criticizing the president over “politically capitalizing on US national security operations and secrets,” including the raid that killed Osama bin Laden.

On April 27, Obama’s campaign posted a one-and-half-minute video to YouTube called “One Chance.” It featured former President Bill Clinton praising Obama for his decision to give the Navy SEALs who killed bin Laden the go-ahead.

“Look, he knew what would happen. Suppose the Navy SEALs had gone in there and it hadn’t been bin Laden,” Clinton suggested, “Suppose that they had been captured or killed. The downside would have been horrible for him [Obama].”

That video was also shown at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, NC at the beginning of September. That’s when King decided to speak out.

“[A]s both a Special Forces veteran and a survivor of the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon,” King wrote to Obama on September 10, “it was frustrating and disappointing to me that your re-election campaign used the bin Laden raid as the basis for a divisive and partisan ad.”

The video, King wrote to Obama, also “unleashes a vicious attack on your political opponent,” framing Mitt Romney as unwilling to pursue bin Laden in 2007.

“That was a terrible lapse in judgment,” King wrote. “Why is it appropriate to use our nation’s response to 9/11 as the basis for a partisan campaign ad?”

“It was an awful mistake to make this ad,” King concluded, “but you can correct it by ordering it to be removed [from] your campaign websites and YouTube. You can further do the right thing and pledge that neither you, nor anyone associated with your campaign, will use the operation that brought justice for the attacks of 9/11 for partisan political advantage again.”

King told TheDC that he realizes the White House receives a lot of correspondence, but given the White House’s unrelated response, it’s unlikely anyone there ever read his letter.

“I don’t even think they ever read it,” King said. “Maybe they read the beginning of it and said ‘oh we’re not going to waste our time with this. Who cares? This one individual — he doesn’t matter’ — and just sent back a form letter.”

King believes that the way his letter was handled is “a reflection of the folks that are running things in the White House — the lack of knowledge, to the point of ignorance, about the military that exists there.”

“It’s almost like there’s a lack of concern about the yeoman soldiers that are out there doing the bidding for the king,” he concluded.

"ALMOST LIKE?!?!" Try, 'always HAS BEEN.' Angry
The War Wagon, proud to be a member of since Sep 2012. Anim_banana

[Image: won-rev-big-2.jpg]
Could be worse. He could have got a reply from Hillary Clinton's Personal Aide Philippe Reines.

Quote:From: Michael Hastings
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 12:50 PM

To: Reines, Philippe I 
Cc: Nuland, Victoria J

Subject: Re: Request for comment 

Why don't you give answers that aren't bullshit for a change?

On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Reines, Philippe I wrote:

I now understand why the official investigation by the Department of the Defense as reported by The Army Times The Washington Post concluded beyond a doubt that you're an unmitigated asshole.

How's that for a non-bullshit response?

Now that we've gotten that out of our systems, have a good day.

And by good day, I mean Fuck Off
The Second Amendment does not GIVE us the right. It tells the gov they can not infringe our right.
[Image: s2b0iw.jpg]
I saw that. Can you imagine how these nimrods will cave, once China or Russia smell blood in the water, and REALLY come after us? Confused

They'll fold faster than Superman on laundry day... Dodgy
The War Wagon, proud to be a member of since Sep 2012. Anim_banana

[Image: won-rev-big-2.jpg]
So the white house is no different than our other elected officials in sending out form letters. You should have seen the form letter I received from my rep when I wrote to them about the Census worker going through my mail.

It's quite common for form letters to be sent out when you send them messages via their website. I really believe that many of those letters are generated just from keywords in whatever you send. No one is actually reading them.

In the case of our reps, it's best to send a paper letter directly to their local office and not use their contact page on their website. You'll have much better results.

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Congress first asked Hillary Clinton about personal email use in 2012, letter shows das 0 605 04-15-2015, 05:09 AM
Last Post: das
  Canadian Writes Misguided Letter Asking Us to Send Obama to Canada | das 9 1,130 11-17-2014, 08:17 AM
Last Post: Camper
  An open letter to President Obama kadar 6 1,276 10-08-2013, 05:19 PM
Last Post: MrPeanut
  California DOJ Issues Letter Requiring Micro-Stamping On Semi-Auto Handguns dc dalton 34 4,516 05-28-2013, 07:17 PM
Last Post: kunsunoke
  Obama Activist and Poll Worker on Camera: “I Voted Twice for Obama” middlefinger 37 3,514 03-12-2013, 04:20 PM
Last Post: Xavier

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Software by MyBB, © 2002-2015 MyBB Group.
Template by Modogodo Design.