Share Thread:  
protesting using your 1st amendment rights makes you a terrorist
Quote:Pentagon Exam Calls Protests 'Low-Level Terrorism,' Angering Activists

A written exam administered by the Pentagon labels "protests" as a form of “low-level terrorism” — enraging civil liberties advocates and activist groups who say it shows blatant disregard of the First Amendment.

The written exam, given as part of Department of Defense employees’ routine training, includes a multiple-choice question that asks:
“Which of the following is an example of low-level terrorism?”

— Attacking the Pentagon

— IEDs

— Hate crimes against racial groups

— Protests

The correct answer, according to the exam, is "Protests."

“Its part of a pattern of equating dissent and protest with terrorism," said Ann Brick, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, which obtained a copy of the question after a Defense Department employee who was taking the test printed the screen on his or her computer terminal.

"It undermines the core constitutional values the Department of Defense is supposed to be defending,” Brick said, referring to the First Amendment right to peaceably assemble.

She said the ACLU has asked the Defense Department to remove the question and send out a correction to all employees who took the exam.
“There were other employees who were unhappy with it and disturbed by it,” Brick said.

Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Les Melnyk said the Defense Department is looking into the matter and expects to provide more information later Wednesday.

“We need to determine if it’s something we’re currently doing,” Melnyk said. “A lot of the information in this exam is intended for people stationed abroad.

We counsel those people to avoid demonstrations.”
Anti-war protesters, who say they have been targets of federal surveillance for years, were livid when they were told about the exam question.

“That’s illegal,” said George Martin, national co-chairman of United for Peace and Justice. “Protest in terms of legal dissent has to be recognized, especially by the authorities.
"It’s not terrorism or a lack of patriotism. We care enough to be active in our government.

Read more:,2933,5269...z2IhzWAgA6
It's the "BILL OF RIGHTS" not the bill of "needs"
Silence the opposition.

Sorry, but this is how it works in Totalitarian states.

We're there. Full blown in the works.
"In 4 more OMao years you won't like how America looks....I guarantee it."
“When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty.” -- Thomas Jefferson
This is not new "news". Did you check the date on the article? It's three and a half years old.
It's ok guys, this only applies to those who don't preach from the "Liberal Manifesto". We'll be fine. Wink
[Image: 23lmtsn.jpg]
LifeInPa, proud to be a member of since Sep 2012.
Sanity, yours if you can keep it. Confused
Ok.... and driving fast makes one a terrorist, too, right?

I think part of the problem is that "terrorist" has such a general definition almost anything can be included in it. I'm sorry, but exercising one's right to free speech is NOT terrorism. It is our right to speak our mind to the government - which aught to represent and listen to US.

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  "Domestic Terrorist" Schuyler Barbeau Mr_Gixxer 5 1,305 02-26-2016, 12:35 AM
Last Post: Mr_Gixxer
  Terrorist attack in Paris Coops 67 7,896 02-11-2015, 09:33 PM
Last Post: Ten*K
  Austin cop makes amazing shot RugerGirl 1 824 12-05-2014, 10:03 PM
Last Post: Ten*K
  'Terrorist Groups' Seize Uranium Compounds, Iraq Tells U.N. das 7 1,168 07-12-2014, 06:50 AM
Last Post: halftrack
  Professor Explains How Guns Made The Civil Rights Movement Possible middlefinger 1 656 06-08-2014, 08:00 AM
Last Post: halftrack

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Software by MyBB, © 2002-2015 MyBB Group.
Template by Modogodo Design.