pa2a.org


Share Thread:  
SCOTUS - did you vote w/ this in mind? IF NOT - you will reap what you've sown
#1
I guess this question is aimed more toward those who did not vote for Romney. This means if you:
DID NOT VOTE
VOTED FOR O
VOTED A THIRD PARTY
etc.

Did you consider that O will now be able to appoint PROBABLY 2 Supreme court justices?

Do you realize that this new court will not only affect you for the rest of your life BUT ALSO your offspring and the entire Nation?

Have you heard that O is already back on the UN Arms control treaty band wagon?

Have you heard that Feinstein from California wants to re-institute the semi-auto ban?

Have you heard....
Have you heard....
Did you read........
Did you see........
Do you realize.....

I am OK w/ the decision that you made because it is our system. Just curious if any of the above thoughts weighed into your decision.

DISCUSS?
Ladies of the Second Amendment

"I regard giving as necessary to right the balance" Hu Chung

http://appleseedusa.org/



Reply
#2
Publican;38590 Wrote:I guess this question is aimed more toward those who did not vote for Romney. This means if you:
DID NOT VOTE
VOTED FOR O
VOTED A THIRD PARTY
etc.

Did you consider that O will now be able to appoint PROBABLY 2 Supreme court justices?

Do you realize that this new court will not only affect you for the rest of your life BUT ALSO your offspring and the entire Nation?

Have you heard that O is already back on the UN Arms control treaty band wagon?

Have you heard that Feinstein from California wants to re-institute the semi-auto ban?

Have you heard....
Have you heard....
Did you read........
Did you see........
Do you realize.....

I am OK w/ the decision that you made because it is our system. Just curious if any of the above thoughts weighed into your decision.

DISCUSS?

Did you consider that O will now be able to appoint PROBABLY 2 Supreme court justices?
Do you realize that this new court will not only affect you for the rest of your life BUT ALSO your offspring and the entire Nation?


we have no idea how many he will appoint and neither do you it can be the entire court twice over or none. Regardless Romney likes to and consistantly did appoint libtards anyway



Have you heard that O is already back on the UN Arms control treaty band wagon?


it won't happen so I'm worried about this one at all


Have you heard that Feinstein from California wants to re-institute the semi-auto ban?

Thats why I didn't vote for Romney in the first place, the guy passed an AWB in Massachusetts and prevented a whole state from obtaining certain firearms. The question I have is now that you know all of this why the HELL did you vote for romney and NOT a third party? Every thing you listed here (minus the UN) is exactly why one WOULDN'T vote from Romeny[/b]
Reply
#3
Publican;38590 Wrote:DISCUSS?

It's been discussed, and those that voted other than for the Republican nominee were more interested in punishing the GOP for not nominating Ron Paul than they were in losing their 2nd Amendment freedom, forever.

They'll be along, shortly, to explain their "reasoning".
kevindsingleton, proud to be a contributing member of pa2a.org since Sep 2012.

Have some Pi: http://www.raspberrypi.org/
Reply
#4
So what, it was a R judge that FUCKED US FOR THE AGES and let Obamacare through.

If it was up to me, i'd replace the 5 R's on the bench with circus monkeys as punishment.

PS: YET ANOTHER THREAD THAT WONT LET ME POST WITHOUT CROPPING THE TITLE LINE. PLEASE FIX THIS.
Reply
#5
The two biggest potentials are liberals anyway, so what's the big deal? Outside of another attempt to blame third party voters for not voting for your terrible candidate, that is.

Justin
[Image: pafoasig.png]
Reply
#6
Valorius;38602 Wrote:So what, it was a R judge that FUCKED US FOR THE AGES and let Obamacare through.

If it was up to me, i'd replace the 5 R's on the bench with circus monkeys as punishment.

PS: YET ANOTHER THREAD THAT WONT LET ME POST WITHOUT CROPPING THE TITLE LINE. PLEASE FIX THIS.

Publican, Valorous; I shortened the thread title by a couple letters by abbreviating Supreme Court as SCOTUS. Hopefully that will help.

RocketFoot has already looked into this repeatedly. It is an limitation within the software and is currently as fixed as its going to get. The trick is to keep thread titles well short of the character limit.

HTH
.
“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.”

William Pitt
Reply
#7
Curmudgeon;38624 Wrote:
Valorius;38602 Wrote:So what, it was a R judge that FUCKED US FOR THE AGES and let Obamacare through.

If it was up to me, i'd replace the 5 R's on the bench with circus monkeys as punishment.

PS: YET ANOTHER THREAD THAT WONT LET ME POST WITHOUT CROPPING THE TITLE LINE. PLEASE FIX THIS.

Publican, Valorous; I shortened the thread title by a couple letters by abbreviating Supreme Court as SCOTUS. Hopefully that will help.

RocketFoot has already looked into this repeatedly. It is an limitation within the software and is currently as fixed as its going to get. The trick is to keep thread titles well short of the character limit.

HTH
.

More often than not simply removing the "re:" from the title line achieves the same result.
Reply
#8
JustinHEMI;38622 Wrote:The two biggest potentials are liberals anyway, so what's the big deal? Outside of another attempt to blame third party voters for not voting for your terrible candidate, that is.

Justin

RESPECTFULLY my fellow poster, no blame being thrown out here. We all are responsible for how we voted and will have to deal w/ said consequences.

And from my OP:
Quote:I am OK w/ the decision that you made because it is our system. Just curious if any of the above thoughts weighed into your decision.


I am truly curious to know the answer. I have questioned many PSU students on this question. SO FAR none of them said that they had the SC in mind when they voted. None of them understood that these next 4 years MAY affect the make up of the SC for their entire lives......

WAS not trying to dis anyone's vote. IF that is how my question came across I appologize to those of you who may be offended.
Ladies of the Second Amendment

"I regard giving as necessary to right the balance" Hu Chung

http://appleseedusa.org/



Reply
#9
kevindsingleton;38594 Wrote:
Publican;38590 Wrote:DISCUSS?

It's been discussed, and those that voted other than for the Republican nominee were more interested in punishing the GOP for not nominating Ron Paul than they were in losing their 2nd Amendment freedom, forever.

They'll be along, shortly, to explain their "reasoning".


Here ya go making excuses again... It all because Romney sucked not because of not electing Ron Paul. However I'll leave this here for ya.

[Image: 542666_443552899037029_895841102_n.png]
Reply
#10
ExcelToExcel;38641 Wrote:
kevindsingleton;38594 Wrote:It's been discussed, and those that voted other than for the Republican nominee were more interested in punishing the GOP for not nominating Ron Paul than they were in losing their 2nd Amendment freedom, forever.

They'll be along, shortly, to explain their "reasoning".


Here ya go making excuses again... It all because Romney sucked not because of not electing Ron Paul. However I'll leave this here for ya.

[Image: 542666_443552899037029_895841102_n.png]

You are simplifying every bit as much as the people you disagree with. There is no guarantee that Paul would have gotten any of those states that you just mentioned. Not only that but a number of Republicans, that I know, would not have bothered showing up if Paul were the Republican candidate. Your assumptions are without merit.
[Image: member955.png]
USAF (1976 -1986) NRA, GOA Anim_sniper2
"The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living." Dan Cofall
Reply






Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  I vote against you ... soberbyker 0 406 05-08-2016, 09:32 AM
Last Post: soberbyker
  SCOTUS kevindsingleton 5 902 06-29-2015, 10:16 AM
Last Post: halftrack
  In close vote, Utah House OKs firing-squad proposal das 14 1,700 03-13-2015, 07:42 AM
Last Post: Uinta Firearms
  Whistleblower: NSA targeted SCOTUS, all domestic communication being recorded. TheWolff 4 1,009 08-22-2013, 11:09 AM
Last Post: Philadelphia Patriot
  Barry Soetoro is registerd to vote in D.C. middlefinger 3 900 07-22-2013, 08:42 AM
Last Post: longcall911



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Software by MyBB, © 2002-2015 MyBB Group.
Template by Modogodo Design.